ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magilligan, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Oyama, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magilligan, D. J., Jr
Right arrow Articles by Oyama, C.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 37, 33-39, Copyright © 1984 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Ultrafiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass: laboratory evaluation and initial clinical experience

DJ Magilligan Jr and C Oyama

Ultrafiltration during crystalloid hemodilution cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was evaluated in two groups of mongrel dogs: in one group during 2 hours of CPB with the heart empty and beating and in the other during 90 minutes of cold cardioplegic arrest followed by 30 minutes of recovery. In both groups, the accumulation of extravascular lung water was less in the dogs undergoing ultrafiltration than in control animals. In 10 patients with clinical evidence of severe fluid overload, ultrafiltration was employed during CPB. The amount of fluid removed ranged from 1,700 to 6,100 ml (mean, 3,240 +/- 1,481 ml [standard deviation]) and resulted in an average intraoperative fluid balance of -901 +/- 2,537 ml, a weight gain of 1.9 +/- 2.5 kg, and a decrease in extravascular lung water from 1,132 +/- 183 ml to 919 +/- 267 ml (p = 0.209). Ultrafiltration is a safe, effective means of removing body water and of preventing further accumulation of such water during hemodilution CPB.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. S. Rivera, T. R. Kimball, W. W. Bailey, S. A. Witt, P. R. Khoury, and S. R. Daniels
Effect of veno-venous ultrafiltration on myocardial performance immediately after cardiac surgery in children: A prospective randomized study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1998; 32(3): 766 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PerfusionHome page
W. Wang, H. M. Huang, De Ming Zhu, H. Chen, Z. K. Su, and W. X. Ding
Modified ultrafiltration in paediatric cardiopulmonary bypass
Perfusion, September 1, 1998; 13(5): 304 - 310.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PerfusionHome page
R. M Babka, J. Petress, R. Briggs, R. Helsel, and J. Mack
Conventional haemofiltration during routine coronary bypass surgery
Perfusion, May 1, 1997; 12(3): 187 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Terada, T. Mitsui, W. Mihara, and M. Tanaka
Ventricular Tachycardia After Ultrafiltration During Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 1997; 63(4): 1215 - 1216.
[Full Text]

Home page
 PerfusionHome page
S. Naik and M. Elliott
Ultrafiltration and paediatric cardiopulmonary bypass
Perfusion, January 1, 1993; 8(1): 101 - 112.
[PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1984 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.