ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garrido, H.
Right arrow Articles by Garrido, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garrido, H.
Right arrow Articles by Garrido, F.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 36, 143-151, Copyright © 1983 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


ARTICLES

Bioelectrical tissue resistance during various methods of myocardial preservation

H Garrido, J Sueiro, J Rivas, J Vilches, JM Romero and F Garrido

Twenty-one mongrel dogs underwent cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and ischemic cardiac arrest for 60 minutes. The bioelectrical tissue impedance, water content, and ultrastructure of the myocardium were studied and correlated with various types of myocardial protection applied. The animals were divided into three groups according to the myocardial protection applied: Group 1, moderate general hypothermia; Group 2, moderate general and local hypothermia; Group 3, moderate general hypothermia and crystalloid cardioplegia. The hearts from 3 normal dogs served as controls. After 35 minutes of ischemic arrest, the difference in bioelectrical impedance of the myocardium of the left ventricle between Groups 1 and 2 was highly significant (p less than 0.001); in Groups 2 and 3, a significant difference was observed after 50 minutes. The heart water content in all three groups increased over that found in the hearts of the control animals, but there was no significant difference between Groups 2 and 3. There was evidence by ultramicroscopic study of ischemic damage to the myocardium in all of the experimental groups. Damage was less evident in Groups 2 and 3. We conclude that measurement of myocardial bioelectrical tissue resistance is a sensitive indicator of myocardial damage due to ischemia and may be useful clinically in determining the need for and type of cardiac resuscitation, particularly following CPB.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. B. Howie, R. Dzwonczyk, and T. D. McSweeney
An Evaluation of a New Two-Electrode Myocardial Electrical Impedance Monitor for Detecting Myocardial Ischemia
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2001; 92(1): 12 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. Pfitzmann, J. Muller, O. Grauhan, and R. Hetzer
Intramyocardial impedance measurements for diagnosis of acute cardiac allograft rejection
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2000; 70(2): 527 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1983 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.