|
|
||||||||
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 35, 455-462, Copyright © 1983 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
M Boers, JJ van den Dungen, GF Karliczek, U Brenken, JN van der Heide and CR Wildevuur
We compared the hemocompatibility of the Polystan bubble oxygenator and the
Travenol TMO and SciMed spiral-coil membrane oxygenators in 43 patients
undergoing aortic valve replacement. In a subgroup of 27 patients, we
collected hematological data and correlated platelet behavior with
hemostasis. We found no differences in blood loss or blood (product)
requirements among the groups. Platelet and erythrocyte damage was less in
the membrane oxygenator groups than in the bubble oxygenator group.
Differences in adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation were
equivalent. Drops in this function concurred with intensified cardiotomy
suction and administration of protamine. Leukocytosis after bypass was most
marked in the SciMed group. Duration of bypass correlated with blood loss
and blood requirements in the operating theater. Platelet counts shortly
after bypass correlated negatively with duration of bypass and blood loss
in the intensive care unit. Platelet function correlated with none of the
factors just mentioned. We conclude that platelets and erythrocytes are
preserved better by the membrane oxygenator than by the bubbler. The TMO
system causes more erythrocyte damage than the SciMed oxygenator, probably
due to TMO's dual-pump system. Clinical evidence for these improvements was
not found, and this will be possible only when the other factors
responsible for blood damage can be controlled.
ARTICLES
Two membrane oxygenators and a bubbler: a clinical comparison
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Weerasinghe and K. M. Taylor The platelet in cardiopulmonary bypass Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 1998; 66(6): 2145 - 2152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. H. Speekenbrink, A. B. A. Vonk, C. R. H. Wildevuur, and L. Eijsman Hemostatic Efficacy of Dipyridamole, Tranexamic Acid, and Aprotinin in Coronary Bypass Grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1995; 59(2): 438 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Rais-Bahrami, G. Mikesell, W. Seale, O. Rivera, J. Hearty, and B. Short In vitro evaluation of the Mera Silox-S 0.5 and 0.8 m2 silicone hollow-fibre membrane oxygenator for use in neonatal ECMO Perfusion, October 1, 1992; 7(4): 315 - 320. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Belboul, N. A. Khaja, P. Bergman, D. Roberts, and G. William-Olsson Postoperative Morbidity Following Red Cell Deformability Changes During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Using Bubble and Membrane Oxygenators Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, July 1, 1989; 23(4): 258 - 264. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.T. Pearson and B. McArdle Haemocompatibility of membrane and bubble oxygenators Perfusion, January 1, 1989; 4(1): 9 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J Zadeh, R. Holazo, C. Conlon, W D. Lazenby, O W. Isom, and K. H Krieger A clinical evaluation of three modern blood oxygenators Perfusion, October 1, 1987; 2(4): 263 - 270. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. T Pearson, M. P Holden, S. J Poslad, A. Murray, and P. S Waterhouse A clinical evaluation of the performance characteristics of one membrane and five bubble oxygenators: gas transfer and gaseous microemboli production Perfusion, January 1, 1986; 1(1): 15 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. T Pearson, B. McArdle, S. J Poslad, and A. Murray A clinical evaluation of the performance characteristics of one membrane and five bubble oxygenators: haemocompatibility studies Perfusion, January 1, 1986; 1(2): 81 - 98. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |