ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gielchinsky, I.
Right arrow Articles by Abel, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gielchinsky, I.
Right arrow Articles by Abel, R. M.

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol 32, 273-277, Copyright © 1981 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

ARTICLES

Delayed sternal closure following open-heart operation

I Gielchinsky, V Parsonnet, B Krishnan, M Silidker and RM Abel

Between June, 1976, and December, 1980, 29 patients underwent delayed sternal closure at the Newark Beth Israel Medical Center. The indications were enlarged heart with tamponade when the mediastinum was closed, poor lung compliance, hemodynamic instability due to intractable arrhythmias or coagulopathy, and presence of a mediastinal assist device. Following an open-heart procedure, the retrosternal space may no longer accommodate the heart and approximation of the sternum will produce hypotension and elevation of right and left end- diastolic pressures. In such instances, only the skin is closed and between one to four days later, the wound is closed in a routine manner. There are several advantages of the procedure: hemodynamic stability; quick access to the heart for massage or evacuation of clots; and possibility of removing an intraaortic balloon in the ascending aorta without leaving a large Dacron tube. Of the 29 patients treated, 19 were long-term survivors and only 1 patient had a minor superficial wound infection. Although it is not recommended that this procedure be utilized routinely or indiscriminately, its judicious use will add flexibility in the management of selected and difficult cases.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1981 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.